{"id":3076,"date":"2024-06-30T16:56:40","date_gmt":"2024-06-30T14:56:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ewspa.edu.pl\/e-czasopismo\/nr-4\/suwerennosc-energetyczna-na-kanwie-pakietu-gotowi-na-55-czesc-2\/"},"modified":"2024-07-04T13:27:07","modified_gmt":"2024-07-04T11:27:07","slug":"suwerennosc-energetyczna-na-kanwie-pakietu-gotowi-na-55-czesc-2","status":"publish","type":"e-czasopismo","link":"https:\/\/ewspa.edu.pl\/en\/e-czasopismo\/nr-4\/suwerennosc-energetyczna-na-kanwie-pakietu-gotowi-na-55-czesc-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Energy Sovereignty on the Basis of the \u2018Fit for 55\u2019 Package. Part 2"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Abstract<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The purpose of this publication divided into two parts is to interpret one of the most difficult provisions of the European Union treaties contained in the second subparagraph of Article 194(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union introducing national energy sovereignty. Reference to Article 192(2)(c) in the second subparagraph of Article 194(2) shall be understood as meaning that if, when adopting measures in the environmental field, the energy objectives (Article 194[1]) do not prevail over the environmental ones (Article 191) and at least one of the conditions required for national energy sovereignty is met (the second subparagraph of Article 194[2]), then Article 192(2)(c) shall be invoked as the Treaty basis (unanimity of the Council). Only in the event that none of the three alternative conditions required for energy sovereignty are met and the energy goals prevail over the environmental ones, the ordinary legislative procedure provided for in the first subparagraph of Article 194(2) shall be followed. The \u201ccommunitarisation\u201d of energy sovereignty merely involves taking the energy solidarity into consideration (Article 194[1]) and adopting measures appropriate to the economic situation on an ad hoc basis (Article 122[1]) whilst taking into account the Declaration on Article 194 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which by referring to two treaty provisions strengthens the energy independence of Member States during a crisis within the meaning of Article 347 to such extent that in practice it necessitates at least a revision of the \u2018Fit for 55\u2019 package proposed by the European Commission. In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 194(2) in conjunction with Article 194(1) the energy transformation shall take place on a national and not the EU level whilst at the same time taking into consideration the energy solidarity principle enshrined in the EU treaties, which has been rejected by Germany before the Court of Justice of the European Union (Germany v. Poland, C-848\/19 P) in order to increase EU\u2019s reliance on the supplies of Russian gas. The \u2018Fit for 55\u2019 package completely ignores these provisions despite the fact that according to some of the legislative proposals contained therein such regulations are applicable. Not only the Polish literature lacks publications on the Treaty basis of conclusions included in the \u2018Fit for 55\u2019 package.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

References<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  1. Banaszek H., \u201eFit for 55 \u2013 rewizja unijnego systemu handlu uprawnieniami do emisji (EU ETS) w ramach Europejskiego Zielonego \u0141adu\u201d, Europejski Przegl\u0105d S\u0105dowy, 2022, 2. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Boute A., \u201eThe principle of solidarity and the geopolitics of energy. Poland v. Commission (OPAL pipeline)\u201d, Common Market Law Review, 2020, 3 (57). [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Buschle D., Talus K., \u201eOne for All and All for One? The General Court ruling in the OPAL Case\u201d, Oil, Gas & Energy Law Intelligence, 2019, 5. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Capacity Mechanisms in the EU Energy Markets: Law, Policy, and Economics, red. L. Hancher i in., wyd. 2, Oxford 2022. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. EU-Kommentar, red. U. Becker, A. Hatje, J. Schoo, J. Schwarze, wyd. 4, Baden-Baden 2019. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  6. EUV\/AEUV. Das Verfassungsrecht der Europ\u00e4ischen Union mit Europ\u00e4ischer Grundrechtecharta. Kommentar, red. Ch. Calliess, M. Ruffert, wyd. 6, M\u00fcnchen 2022. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  7. Frenz W., Kane A.M., \u201eDie neue europ\u00e4ische Energiepolitik\u201d, Natur und Recht, 2010, 7 (32). [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  8. Gontarski W., \u201eNowy system warunkowo\u015bci w prawie Unii Europejskiej\u201d, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, 2021, 97. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  9. Gundel J., \u201eDie energiepolitischen Kompetenzen der EU nach dem Vertrag von Lissabon: Bedeutung und Reichweite des neuen Art. 194 AEUV\u201d, Europ\u00e4isches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht, 2011, 1. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  10. Hancher L., \u201eEuratom, state aid and environmental protection: Hinkley Point\u201d, Common Market Law Review, 2021, 5(58), LEX. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  11. Hey J., \u201eDas Einnahmesystem der Europ\u00e4ischen Union: neue Steuern als neue Eigenmittel?\u201d, Europ\u00e4ische Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Wirtschaftsrecht, 2021, 7. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  12. Kahl W., \u201eDie Kompetenzen der EU in der Energiepolitik nach Lissabon\u201d, Europarecht, 2009, 5. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  13. Kr\u00e4mer A., EU Environmental Law, wyd. 7, London 2012. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  14. Kuhlmann J., \u201eKompetenzrechtliche Neuerungen im europ\u00e4ischen Energierecht nach dem Vertrag von Lissabon\u201d, Working Paper No. 79, Europainstitut Wirtschaftsuniversit\u00e4t Wien, Juni 2008 (https:\/\/epub.wu.ac.at\/1072\/1\/document.pdf)<\/a>. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  15. M\u00f6stl M., \u201eCase C-115\/08, Land Ober\u00f6sterreich v. CEZ, Judgment of the Grand Chamber of 27 October 2008\u201d, Common Market Law Review, 2010, 4(47). [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  16. M\u00fcnchmeyer H., Kahles H., Pause F., \u201eErfordert das europ\u00e4ische Beihilferecht die Einf\u00fchrung von Ausschreibungsverfahren im EEG?\u201d, W\u00fcrzburger Berichte zum Umweltenergierecht, 2014, 5 (https:\/\/stiftung-umweltenergierecht.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/stiftungumweltenergierecht_WueBerichte_05_Beihilferecht-Erfordernis-Ausschreibungen.pdf)<\/a>. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  17. Olthoff M., Bonin A. von, \u201eDas \u00bbHinkley Point\u00ab -Urteil des EuGH: Ber\u00fccksichtigung von Nachhaltigkeitsaspekten in der beihilferechtlichen Pr\u00fcfung sowie allgemein im EU-Kartell- und Fusionskontrollrecht\u201d, Europ\u00e4ische Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Wirtschafts-recht, 2021, 5. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  18. Pakiet klimatyczno-energetyczny. Analityczna ocena propozycji Komisji Europejskiej, red. K. Maliszewska, Warszawa 2008. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  19. Papenkort K., Wellershoff J.-K., \u201eDer Energietitel im Vertrag von Lissabon \u2013 Alter Wein in neuen Schl\u00e4uchen\u201d, Recht der Energiewirtschaft, 2010, 18. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  20. Parchimowicz-Gontarska I., \u201eArtyku\u0142 1 ust. 2 Protoko\u0142u nr 30 w sprawie stosowania Karty praw podstawowych a og\u00f3lny system warunkowo\u015bci s\u0142u\u017c\u0105cy ochronie bud\u017cetu Unii Europejskiej\u201d, Europejski Przegl\u0105d Prawa i Stosunk\u00f3w Mi\u0119dzynarodowych, 2021, 4, LEX. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  21. Probleme und Perspektiven im Energieumweltrecht, red. W. Cremer, J-Ch. Pielow, Stuttgart 2009. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  22. Przybojewska I., \u201ePoszukiwanie i wydobywanie gazu niekonwencjonalnego w Polsce\u201d, Europejski Przegl\u0105d S\u0105dowy, 2012, 7. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  23. Research Handbook on Climate Change Mitigation Law, red. L. Reins i in., wyd. 2, Cheltenham 2022. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  24. Romanowicz M., \u201eGotowi na transformacj\u0119? Polityka klimatyczna Unii Europejskiej w \u015bwietle Pakietu Fit for 55\u201d, Europejski Przegl\u0105d S\u0105dowy, 2022, 2. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  25. Ruffert M., \u201eVorgaben des Europarechts und nationale Gestaltungsspielr\u00e4ume\u201d, Energieversorgung und Umweltschutz, 2010, tom 102. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  26. Schlacke S., \u201eKlimaschutzrecht im Mehrebenensystem\u201d, Neue Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Verwaltungsrecht, 2022, 13. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  27. Schlacke S., Knodt M., \u201eDas Governance-System f\u00fcr die Europ\u00e4ische Energieunion und f\u00fcr den Klimaschutz\u201d, Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Umweltrecht, 2019, 7\u20138. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  28. Schlacke S., Wentzien H., Thierjung E.-M., K\u00f6ster M., \u201eImplementing the EU Climate Law via the \u2018Fit for 55\u2019 package\u201d, Oxford Open Energy, 2022, 1 (https:\/\/academic. oup.com\/journals). [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  29. Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej. Komentarz, tom 2 (art. 90\u2013222), red. A. Wr\u00f3bel i in., Warszawa 2012, LEX. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  30. Traktat o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej. Komentarz, tom 3 (art. 223\u2013358), red. A. Wr\u00f3bel i in., Warszawa 2012, LEX. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  31. Zajdler R., \u201eZastrze\u017cenia do decyzji Komisji Europejskiej z 28 pa\u017adziernika 2016 roku w sprawie zmiany zwolnienia dla gazoci\u0105gu OPAL (sprawa C[2016]6950 final)\u201d, Polityka i Spo\u0142ecze\u0144stwo, 2018, 1. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  32. Zmiany klimatu w \u015bwietle prawa Unii Europejskiej i prawa polskiego na tle por\u00f3wnawczym, red. C. Mik, A. Borek, Warszawa 2021 [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Most read articles by the same author(s)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n