{"id":2886,"date":"2024-06-30T17:11:20","date_gmt":"2024-06-30T15:11:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ewspa.edu.pl\/e-czasopismo\/nr-4-2\/zazalenie-do-sadu-najwyzszego-uwagi-de-lege-lata-i-de-lege-ferenda\/"},"modified":"2024-07-03T17:19:53","modified_gmt":"2024-07-03T15:19:53","slug":"zazalenie-do-sadu-najwyzszego-uwagi-de-lege-lata-i-de-lege-ferenda","status":"publish","type":"e-czasopismo","link":"https:\/\/ewspa.edu.pl\/en\/e-czasopismo\/nr-4-2\/zazalenie-do-sadu-najwyzszego-uwagi-de-lege-lata-i-de-lege-ferenda\/","title":{"rendered":"Complaint to the Supreme Court \u2013 comments de lege lata and de lege ferenda"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Abstract<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

This paper presents an outline of the title issue together with the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court regarding the resolution of legal questions that raise serious doubts. The article deals with one of the specific remedies at law \u2013 a complaint to the Supreme
Court, and therefore not brought before the ordinary court. The legislator has provided for a very narrow range of rulings that can be challenged by this complaint, which is understandable, as the Supreme Court is an extraordinary court to which strictly de-
fined measures (in addition to this complaint, primarily a cassation complaint, a complaint for declaration of illegality of a final decision and an extraordinary complaint) can be filed. This entails a strictly defined (very narrow) catalogue of decisions that may be
challenged by complaint to the Supreme Court. Due to the specific nature of the complaint in question, a number of questions arise, starting with which court the formal and fiscal requirements are to be examined. Therefore, the article discusses the current
solutions for this remedy at law and presents solutions that should be introduced to remove the existing doubts and flaws.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

References<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  1. Bladowski B., Glosa do uchwa\u0142y z 22 lutego 2006 r., III CZP 6\/06, \u201ePalestra\u201d 2007, 3\u20134. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Jankowski J., Nowelizacja kodeksu post\u0119powania cywilnego, cz. 1. Post\u0119powanie rozpoznawcze, \u201eMonitor Prawniczy\u201d 2012, 2. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. Kodeks post\u0119powania cywilnego. Komentarz do ustawy z 4 lipca 2019 r. o zmianie ustawy \u2013 Kodeks post\u0119powania cywilnego oraz niekt\u00f3rych innych ustaw, red. J. Go\u0142aczy\u0144ski, D. Szostek, Warszawa 2019. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Kodeks post\u0119powania cywilnego. Komentarz, red. A. Zieli\u0144ski, Warszawa 2022. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  5. Kodeks post\u0119powania cywilnego. Komentarz, red. P. Rylski, Legalis 2022. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  6. Kodeks post\u0119powania cywilnego. Komentarz, tom 2. Art. 2051\u201342412, red. A. Marciniak, Warszawa 2019 [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  7. Kodeks post\u0119powania cywilnego. Komentarz, tom 1. Art. 1\u201350514, red. K. Piasecki, Warszawa 2006. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  8. Kodeks post\u0119powania cywilnego. Komentarz, tom 1. Art. 1\u201347716, red. M. Manowska, Warszawa 2022. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  9. Kodeks post\u0119powania cywilnego. Komentarz, tom 2. Art. 367\u201350539, red. T. Wi\u015bniewski, Warszawa 2021. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  10. Kodeks post\u0119powania cywilnego. Koszty s\u0105dowe w sprawach cywilnych. Dochodzenie roszcze\u0144 w post\u0119powaniu grupowym. Przepisy przej\u015bciowe. Komentarz do zmian, tom 1, red. T. Zembrzuski, Warszawa 2020. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  11. Kodeks post\u0119powania cywilnego. Koszty s\u0105dowe w sprawach cywilnych. Dochodzenie roszcze\u0144 w post\u0119powaniu grupowym. Przepisy przej\u015bciowe. Komentarz do zmian, tom 2, red. T. Zembrzuski, Warszawa 2020. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  12. Reforma post\u0119powania cywilnego w \u015bwietle projekt\u00f3w Komisji Kodyfikacyjnej, red. K. Markiewicz, Warszawa 2011. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  13. System post\u0119powania cywilnego, tom 6. Post\u0119powania odr\u0119bne, red. A. Machnikowska, Warszawa 2022. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  14. Wi\u015bniewski T., Przebieg procesu cywilnego, Warszawa 2013. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
  15. Zieli\u0144ski A., Konstytucyjny standard instancyjno\u015bci post\u0119powania s\u0105dowego, \u201ePa\u0144stwo i Prawo\u201d 2005, 11. [Google Scholar]<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Most read articles by the same author(s)<\/h3>\n\n\n\n